top of page

The Real Reason For US Trade Deficits: The US Dollar.

Tex Ogun

The U.S. dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency is both a privilege and a paradox. While it cements America’s role as a linchpin of global trade and finance, it imposes structural challenges that perpetuate chronic trade deficits. These deficits, often framed as economic imbalances, are not mere policy failures but intrinsic to the dollar's role in the global monetary system. This dynamic is illustrated through China’s persistent trade surplus with the United States, both a reflection of strategic economic policies and the People’s Bank of China’s (PBOC) reluctance to allow significant appreciation of the yuan.


Stacks of coins and a money bag with a dollar sign near a small U.S. flag and plant. A rising graph and cargo ship in the background. Text: BONI.

 

At the heart of the dollar’s dominance lies the Triffin Dilemma, which highlights the conflicting requirements of a global reserve currency. For the dollar to fulfill its role properly, it must be widely available, necessitating that the U.S. supply dollars through trade deficits. These deficits allow other countries, particularly export-driven economies like China, to accumulate dollars, which they often recycle into U.S. assets. This cycle benefits the United States by ensuring demand for its debt and sustaining low borrowing costs. However, it also entrenches trade imbalances that are difficult, if not impossible, to resolve as long as the dollar remains the global reserve currency..

 

China’s economic strategy exemplifies how countries have leveraged this dynamic to fuel their own growth. Over the decades, China has maintained a significant trade surplus with the United States by positioning itself as a global manufacturing hub. This surplus reflects not only China’s comparative advantages in labour and production, but also deliberate policies aimed at managing its currency. The Peoples Bank of China (PBOC) has intervened heavily in foreign exchange markets, preventing the yuan from appreciating significantly against the dollar. By keeping its currency undervalued, China ensures that its exports remain competitive, sustaining high levels of employment and industrial output. This policy also allows China to accumulate vast reserves of U.S. dollars, which it uses to purchase U.S. Treasury securities, reinforcing its financial influence while perpetuating the trade imbalance.

 

The United States has repeatedly attempted to address this imbalance, often through tariffs and other protectionist measures. However, these approaches fail to address the structural factors underpinning the deficit. Tariffs may reduce imports from China in the short term, but the global demand for dollars ensures that the deficit is merely redistributed to other trading partners. Moreover, such measures often provoke retaliation and disrupt global supply chains, raising costs for U.S. businesses and consumers. The fundamental issue remains the dollar’s role as the reserve currency, which necessitates trade deficits to meet international liquidity needs.

 

Efforts to counteract these dynamics through currency adjustments are similarly fraught with challenges, as demonstrated by the experience of Japan in the 1980s. Following the Plaza Accord, Japan agreed to appreciate the yen against the dollar in an effort to reduce its trade surplus with the United States. While the yen strengthened significantly, the economic consequences for Japan were devastating. Japanese exports became less competitive, leading to industrial decline, while aggressive monetary easing to offset the impact fuelled an asset price bubble. When the bubble burst, Japan entered a prolonged period of stagnation and deflation, the so-called "Lost Decades". This episode underscores the risks of attempting to rebalance trade through forced currency appreciation, a lesson that China has undoubtedly internalized.

 

China’s reluctance to allow substantial appreciation of the yuan is therefore not just an economic choice but a strategic one. Rapid currency appreciation could undermine its export-driven growth model, destabilize its financial system, and lead to social unrest if industrial output and employment were to decline. For China, maintaining a controlled exchange rate is a cornerstone of its broader economic strategy, even if it exacerbates tensions with the United States.

 

President Donald Trump would have the world believe that the US is being “ripped-off” but fails to acknowledge the exorbitant US dollar privilege gained through seigniorage. This is a cornerstone of America’s economic strength, enabling it to finance deficits, maintain monetary stability, and sustain its position as a global economic leader. Seigniorage, in a traditional sense, refers to the profit a government earns by issuing currency, particularly the difference between the face value of money and its production cost. When applied to the U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency, seigniorage extends beyond domestic currency issuance to encompass the unique benefits the U.S. derives from the widespread global use of the dollar in international trade, finance, and as a store of value.

Barry Eichengreen, an economist, noted, "It costs only a few cents for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to produce a $100 bill, but other countries had to pony up $100 of actual goods in order to obtain one."

 As former Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke explained, “The U.S. benefits from issuing the global reserve currency as it allows us to finance our deficits in our own currency, which is a unique privilege.” Unlike other countries that must accumulate foreign reserves to defend their currencies, the U.S. can print dollars to fund domestic needs without risking currency collapse.

While the U.S. benefits immensely from dollar seigniorage, there are however long-term risks. Financial commentators like Peter Schiff warn that reliance on the dollar’s reserve currency status is not sustainable indefinitely. Schiff has argued that “the dollar’s days as the reserve currency are numbered” due to mounting U.S. debt and rising global efforts to reduce dependence on the dollar.

 

Other critics, such as Nouriel Roubini, have pointed out that geopolitical shifts, including China and Russia’s push for alternative reserve currencies, could erode the dollar’s dominance over time. For example, China has been promoting the use of the yuan in global trade and recently brokered yuan-based oil deals with Saudi Arabia.

For financial investors and trade experts, these dynamics have far-reaching implications. The persistent U.S. trade deficit, especially with China, highlights the limitations of conventional policy tools in addressing structural imbalances. Tariffs, currency interventions, and other unilateral measures often fail to account for the systemic forces at play. Meanwhile, the dollar’s continued dominance ensures a strong U.S. currency, which benefits global investors seeking stability but disadvantages American exporters and manufacturers.

 

The U.S. dollar’s role as the reserve currency thus creates a perpetual cycle of trade deficits that cannot be easily resolved without significant changes to the global financial architecture. China’s strategic management of the yuan and its vast trade surplus with the United States demonstrate how this system can be both exploited and perpetuated. Attempts to disrupt these dynamics, whether through tariffs or currency agreements, risk unintended consequences, as history has shown. For those navigating the complexities of global trade and finance, understanding these structural realities is essential to anticipating both risks and opportunities in a world dominated by the dollar.

Commentaires


bottom of page